值得推薦的房屋二胎 房屋借錢 當日撥款喔! 全省房屋二胎三胎借款,土地借款 土地持分借款( 建地,農地,山坡地,林地及各種科目土地都可,持分也可以借款) 全省服務 土地一胎借款,二胎借款,三胎借款 台中.大安.大甲.外埔.清水.神岡.后里.東勢.梧棲.沙鹿.大雅.潭子.豐原.石岡.新社.龍井.西屯.北屯.大肚.南屯.西區.北區.東區.南區.太平.大里.烏日.霧峰.中區.和平.北投.士林.內湖.松山.中山區.大同區.中正區.信義區.大安區.文山區.萬華.南港.宜蘭.頭城.礁溪.壯圍.員山.羅東.五結.三星.冬山.蘇澳.大同.南澳.中壢.平鎮.楊梅.龍潭.八德.蘆竹.桃園.龜山.新屋.大溪.大園.南崁.觀音.龍岡.埔心.內壢.山仔頂.基隆.七堵.八堵.安樂.中山.仁愛.信義.中正.暖暖.五堵.新北市.烏來.三峽.新店.石碇.坪林.鶯歌.樹林.土城.新莊.板橋.中和.永和.深坑.平溪.雙溪.貢寮.瑞芳.汐止.三重.泰山.林口.八里.五股.蘆洲.淡水.三芝.萬里.石門.金山.新竹.竹北.竹東.新豐.關西.湖口.新埔.峨眉.尖石.五峰.橫山.芎林.北埔.寶山.高雄.楠梓.台南.永康.嘉義.彰化.南投.金門.台東.屏東.花蓮.澎湖.房屋二胎借款,房屋借款,二胎借款,當日撥款,急用借款,房屋三胎,急用借錢,低利貸款,低利借款,利息最低,房屋二胎,二胎增貸,土地借款,土地二胎,三胎借款,二胎,三胎,借款,貸款,增借,增貸,農地借款,農地二胎,持分,持分借款,房屋持分,土地持分,房屋貸款,房屋增貸,房屋增借,土地貸款,土地增貸
FINAL RULING: The verdict would prevent other former presidents from being ‘unreasonably accused’ the way Ma encountered in this case, his spokeswoman said
/ Staff writer, with CNA
The Taiwan High Court yesterday upheld a lower court ruling acquitting former president Ma Ying-jeou （馬英九） of abetting a leak of classified information related to an investigation into an opposition lawmaker in 2013.
The H二胎增貸igh Court’s ruling is final and cannot be appealed.
Presiding judge Chou Cheng-ta （周政達） said that Democratic Progressive Party caucus whip Ker Chien-ming （柯建銘）, 蘆竹房屋二胎who had accused Ma of leaking state secrets, failed to present sufficient evidence to prove Ma’s guilt.
Ma’s office spokeswoman Hsu嘉義房屋二胎 Chiao-hsin （徐巧芯金門房屋二胎） later told a news conference that Ma was grateful for the ruling.
When asked for comments, Ma only nodded and smiled to reporters.
Neither Ma nor Ker were pre桃園房屋借款sent in the courtroom to hear the verdict.
The case dates back to September 2013, when it was台南房屋二胎 revealed that then-state prosecutor-general Huang Shyh-ming （黃世銘） had shown Ma a transcript of wiretapped conversations that were part of evidence collected in an ongoing investigation of an alleged breach of trust by Ker.
In the taped conversations, then-legislative speaker Wang Jin-pyng （王金平） and Ker were heard talking about lobbying two senior Ministry of Justice officials, including the minister of justice, to prevent any appeal of the breach of trust case in which Ker had been acquitted.
Prosecutors said that Ma encouraged Huang to leak the contents of the recording, Ker’s personal information and other informa桃園房屋二胎tion related to the ongoing investigation to then-premier Jiang Yi-huah （江宜樺） and then-Presidential Office deputy secretary-general Lo Chih-chiang （羅智強）.
Chou said that the wiretapped conversation failed to present sufficient evidence to prove Ma had instigated Huang to leak the recording, and it was constitutional for Ma, as president, to express concern about the domestic political situati利息最低on.
The verdict also cited President Tsai Ing-wen’s （蔡英文） management of Cabinet appointments, saying Tsai personally asked Cabinet officials to remain at their posts after the Cabinet resig土地增貸ned en masse last month, suggesting that it is constitutional for a president to step in when Cabinet members are engulfed in a political scandal or involved in illegal activities.
Yesterday’s ruling upheld the Taipei District Co房屋持分urt’s Aug. 25 ruling, which found Ma not guilty, saying there was insufficient evidence to prove he had instigated the leak and there was no indication of criminal intent on Ma’s part.
The court also cited Article 44 of the Constitution, saying that as president, Ma had the power to intervene in disputes between different branches of government.
Hsu said the ruling shows that a former president would not have to be bothered by unreasonable accusations like the lawsuit brought by Ker.